After weeks of disruption to scientific federal grants, the National Institutes of Health has fallen behind in funding ...

Grant funding uncertainty has jeopardized the sustainability of research projects and discouraged researchers.

The Trump administration recently announced a reduction in NIH funding for facilities and administration costs. These changes ...

“If small biotech companies like ours are forced to scale back or shut down, it will not just be a loss for scientific ...

Although currently blocked by a federal court, the policy would limit research funding from NIH for “indirect costs,” or overhead expenses, to 15%.

The impact of these cuts extends far beyond the lab. Professors, many of whom rely on grant funding to support their salaries and research teams, could face layoffs or reduced stipends.

According to Huganir, NIH funding covers roughly 70 percent of research in the U.S. The rest is covered through philanthropy and other federal agencies like the Department of Defense and the ...

BOSTON, Feb 10 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Monday temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's administration's sharp cuts to federal grant funding for universities, medical centers and other ...

New York State, a leader in medical research, receives the second-highest amount of NIH funding, supporting thousands of jobs and generating billions in economic activity. In news that should ...

Listen to someone who knows, someone like Jean Cook, professor and chair of Biochemistry and Biophysics at UNC-Chapel Hill.

Colorado's medical research community is looking at how to handle the potential of cuts to research grant money that it ...

Those projects involved more than 300,000 researchers at more that 2500 universities, medical schools and research institutions. "Of this funding, approximately $26 billion went to direct costs ...