News
Where a retailer sells third-party goods, absent some explicit attempt to use its own brand in relation to those goods, the retailer’s mark is not being used as a trademark for those goods.
The characterisation of a non-distinctive figurative sign as a position mark does not render the sign distinctive.
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the WTR experts.
The EUIPO notably rejected Supermac’s argument that the SUPERMAC’S mark and McDonald’s had coexisted in Ireland for decades, ...
The JPO found that consumers were likely to perceive the mark META READY as a whole, rather than focusing solely on the word ...
The multi-pronged examination targets IP enforcement, digital trade and tariff policies as Brazilian legal experts defend the ...
The European Commission has identified the AI models and companies that must comply with the EU AI Act's general purpose obligations.
Pisco wars: Delhi High Court upholds ‘Peruvian’ and ‘Chilean’ GIs in landmark homonymous GIs dispute
Homonymous GIs can coexist when supported by longstanding historical use and adequate measures to safeguard consumers.
The decision highlights the High Court’s willingness to intervene where threats of legal proceedings may be unjustified and cause commercial harm.
WTR is a unique and timely intelligence service informing commercial trademark decision making by assessing the business impact of trademark law developments.
WTR is a unique and timely intelligence service informing commercial trademark decision making by assessing the business impact of trademark law developments.
Register for free to receive our newsletter, view leading trademark professionals in WTR 1000 and gain limited access to subscriber content.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results