News

If you're not familiar with Claude, it's the family of large-language models made by the AI company Anthropic. And Claude just got a huge upgrade in the form of Claude 4, Anthropic's newest AI model.
Anthropic reports that Claude Opus 4 scored 72.5% on the SWE-bench Verified coding benchmark, but the model’s focus extends beyond programming. Improvements in long-form writing, ...
Anthropic tailored Claude Opus 4 for greater precision and better understanding of codebases than previous models. SEE: Apple is rumored to be preparing a SDK for its on-device AI models .
Anthropic says Claude Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 outperform rivals like OpenAI's o3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro on key benchmarks for agentic coding tasks like SWE-bench and Terminal-bench.
Like Claude 3.7 Sonnet before it and Opus 4, the new system is a hybrid reasoning model, meaning it can execute prompts nearly instantaneously and engage in extended thinking.
Both Claude 3 Opus and GPT-4 are designed to generate text based on input prompts. However, ... as it can streamline the process of extracting insights and drawing conclusions.
On Thursday, Anthropic released Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4, marking the company's return to larger model releases after primarily focusing on mid-range Sonnet variants since June of last year.
As for Claude Opus 4, Anthropic says it matches or outperforms OpenAI’s o3, GPT-4.1, and Gemini 2.5 Pro in benchmarks for multilingual Q&A, agentic tool use, agentic terminal coding, agentic ...
Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic's most powerful model to date, and it is the world's best coding model with a 72.5 percent score on SWE-bench and 43.2 percent score on Terminal-bench.
Anthropic’s new Claude Opus 4 model was prompted to act as an assistant at a fictional company and was given access to emails with key implications. First, these emails implied that the AI ...
In this guide, we will take an in-depth look at how Claude 3 Opus vs ChatGPT-4 compare when it comes to writing code, focusing on their features, performance, and overall utility for developers.