ChatGPT and Claude 4 are two of the smartest AI assistants available but they’re built with different strengths. Here’s how ...

Discover how Claude 4 and Grok 4 compare in AI app development. Which model excels in efficiency, reliability, and ...

Paying customers (Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise Claude plans) can use either Opus 4 or Sonnet 4; free users have access only to Sonnet 4. The models are also accessible via the Anthropic API ...

The company described Claude Opus 4 as the “world’s best coding model” when it launched in May. The LLM set a new record on ...

Compare their strengths, weaknesses, and find out which AI tool fits your workflow better after the latest updates and features.

Grok 4 is a huge leap from Grok 3, but how good is it compared to other models in the market, such as Gemini 2.5 Pro? We now have answers, thanks to new independent benchmarks.

According to Anthropic, Claude Sonnet 4 (its mid-tier model, between Raiku and Opus) significantly improves at coding, reasoning, and instruction following compared to its predecessor, Claude ...

Anthropic’s Claude 4 models arrive as the company looks to substantially grow revenue. Reportedly , the outfit, founded by ex-OpenAI researchers, aims to notch $12 billion in earnings in 2027 ...

Both Claude 4 models maintain the same pricing structure as their predecessors: Opus 4 costs $15 per million tokens for input and $75 per million for output, while Sonnet 4 remains at $3 and $15.

Claude Sonnet 4 is a more affordable and efficiency-focused model that’s better suited to general tasks, which supersedes the 3.7 Sonnet model released in February.

Claude 4 Opus is excellent at solving complex problems and at programming. In fact, according to Anthropic, it’s the world’s best AI model for programming.